
At the recent Insurtech Insights USA conference, more than 6,000 insurance leaders talked about a problem that's become impossible to ignore. Outdated operational software continues to slow down modern underwriting, claims, and payment workflows, even as pressure mounts to adopt AI and deliver slick digital experiences.
According to a Deloitte industry study, 76% of insurance companies had implemented generative AI in at least one function by mid-2024. That kind of rapid adoption makes a functional digital foundation more urgent than ever. But here's the thing: successful modernization is rarely a choice between doing nothing and ripping everything out.
You can upgrade your operations through a practical, step-by-step approach. By treating your primary legacy systems as secure systems of record, you focus on improving the workflows around them instead. This guide walks you through a connection-first strategy that minimizes business disruption while actually moving the needle. Sound like something your team needs? Keep reading.
Start With a Workflow Audit, Not a Platform Shopping List
The first step toward modernization isn't buying new software. Your first priority is understanding exactly where daily work gets stuck. If you purchase a new platform before mapping your workflows, you'll just digitize your existing bottlenecks, and they'll move faster, which is arguably worse.
Map the Work That Slows Revenue and Service
Audit your end-to-end workflows across the business. Track the journey of submission intake, underwriting triage, document collection, and quote generation. Then review how your team handles claims intake, payment processing, and policy servicing. Think of it like tracing water through pipes: you need to find the leaks before you start replacing fixtures.
Many delays happen between systems, teams, and handoffs rather than inside the main platform itself. Duplicate manual entry and clunky broker experiences often stem from poor process design, not the core technology. Ask any operations lead who's been in the business ten years, and they'll tell you the same thing: the real pain lives in the gaps between tools. You've got to map those disjointed processes to see where your staff wastes the most time.
Identify Friction by Business Impact
Once you've mapped the workflows, rank your pain points by revenue impact, service delays, and compliance risk. Look for tasks that frustrate customers or cost too much to maintain. Research from TechTarget indicates that 62% of U.S. organizations still rely on legacy systems, often delaying upgrades simply because the old technology still technically functions.
Analysts also estimate that 60% to 80% of IT budgets go toward maintaining aging systems rather than driving innovation. That's a staggering share of spend that isn't producing forward progress. Use this simple diagnostic process to find your best starting point:
- Document each workflow step from intake to completion.
- Note every manual handoff, spreadsheet, email dependency, and duplicate entry point.
- Measure delays, error rates, abandonment, and rework volume.
- Rank problems by impact on underwriting speed, claims turnaround, or payment collection.
- Choose one or two high-friction workflows for the first modernization sprint.
Automate Low-Risk Workflows First
Start with tasks that create obvious drag but carry lower implementation risk. Incremental upgrades build momentum and prove the value of new technology to your team, which matters more than you'd think when it comes to getting buy-in for the next round of improvements.
Focus on Repetitive, Rules-Based Tasks
Look for highly repetitive tasks that don't require human judgment. Good candidates for automation include document intake classification, payment reminders, and status notifications. You can also automate claim-triage routing, policy-renewal reminders, and internal approval chains. For instance, picture a mid-size carrier that's still emailing PDF reminders manually for upcoming renewals; that's an easy win that frees up hours every week.
Don't oversell automation to your team, though. Automating a fundamentally broken process will simply make bad work happen faster. You've got to fix the underlying process steps before layering on automation tools. Otherwise, you're just putting a turbocharger on a car with no steering wheel.
Modernize the Edges Before Touching the Base System
You can achieve meaningful efficiency gains by leaving your foundational system untouched while adding a modern workflow layer around it. This approach reduces manual effort without destabilizing mission-critical operations. Commercial insurance leaders are increasingly favoring broader ecosystem strategies over single-system replacements, and for good reason.
Industry reports warn that rip-and-replace projects often create delays. The market now favors flexible deployments, with cloud-based options accounting for 72% of new implementations in 2024. Technology providers have also introduced claims tools designed to improve operations without migration from primary legacy platforms.
| Modernization Move | Risk Level | Time to Value | Best Use Case | Common Pitfall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automating document intake | Low | Fast | Claims, underwriting submissions | Poor document rules |
| Adding payment reminders/workflows | Low | Fast | Billing and collections | Weak customer messaging |
| Connecting systems via API middleware | Medium | Moderate | Data sharing across old and new tools | Incomplete field mapping |
| Rebuilding the policy admin base system | High | Slow | When the system is truly blocking growth | Cost overruns and migration delays |
| Full rip-and-replace transformation | Very high | Slowest | Rare cases with unsalvageable architecture | Business disruption |
Build an API Plan Before You Add AI
Artificial intelligence depends on clean access to data and workflows. If your software tools can't talk to each other, AI will magnify inefficiency rather than remove it. Not the outcome you're hoping for, right?
Treat System Connectivity as Strategy, Not Plumbing
Application programming interfaces (APIs) are digital messengers that let separate systems exchange data in a structured way. They serve as a practical bridge between old mainframes and modern web applications. APIs are especially critical in insurance because quoting tools need policy data, payment platforms need billing records, and claims systems need loss details from intake forms.
Without reliable APIs, your team will constantly retype data across different screens (which is where a lot of those error rates come from, by the way). If you want to prepare your firm for advanced automation, focus first on how tools pull, exchange, and process information across systems.
Prioritize the Data Flows That Unlock the Most Value
Identify the highest-value data connections first. Connect your customer relationship management (CRM) software directly to your policy system. Link your broker portal to your underwriting intake queue so submissions don't sit in someone's inbox for half a day.
You can also map first notice of loss (FNOL) data directly to claims assignment tools. By prioritizing these data bridges, you can cut turnaround times without replacing your primary platform. So far, you've audited workflows and targeted low-risk automation; here's where the real plumbing work starts paying off.
Why AI Projects Stall on Old Infrastructure
Many insurers mistakenly apply AI to outdated, fragmented workflows rather than redesigning the workflow itself. The result? AI layered onto fragmented processes can simply accelerate existing bottlenecks. Older systems weren't built for real-time orchestration, and no amount of machine learning can fix a data pipeline that barely trickles.
With 76% of insurers using generative AI, proper API planning is one of the clearest ways to make these tools actually effective. A modern middleware layer gives your AI tools the clean, structured data they need to function. Skip this step, and you'll wonder why that shiny new AI tool is producing garbage outputs.
Upgrade the Customer Experience at the Surface Layer
You can improve customer and broker experiences without touching your backend processing software. Surface-level upgrades directly support growth, retention, and satisfaction, which is great news if you're working with a tight budget for deeper system changes.
Start With Digital Touchpoints Customers Actually Notice
Focus your budget on the interfaces your clients use daily. Build better online payment portals, transparent claims status pages, and clean digital intake forms. Invest in broker self-service portals and mobile-friendly policy service tools, too.
These upgrades make your brand feel modern and responsive. They also reduce the volume of incoming phone calls for simple status updates or billing questions, freeing up your service team to focus on higher-value work. You've probably seen this pattern yourself if you've ever tried to check a claim status only to get a "please call us" message.
Improve Front-End Experience Even If the Back End Stays the Same
Customers rarely care what software system you use behind the scenes. They care whether forms are easy to complete, payments work smoothly, and claims are visible. Research from J.D. Power shows that 53% of first-time insurance buyers begin their relationships through digital channels.
During the MIT Sloan CIO Symposium, executives from Liberty Mutual and Travelers emphasized exactly this point, noting that modernization efforts should elevate customer experiences or improve immediate operations. If the upgrade doesn't make the customer's life noticeably easier, it probably shouldn't be at the top of the priority list.
Know When to Build Custom Tools Instead of Buying Another Platform
Off-the-shelf software works well for standard business needs. But commercial tools often fall short when insurers operate with highly specialized or strictly regulated workflows. And yes, there's a catch: finding the right balance between "buy" and "build" takes some honest self-assessment.
Signs a Custom Build Makes More Sense
Consider a custom build when you've got niche underwriting flows or unusual approval chains. Custom tools also make sense for complex claims-intake logic or when legacy systems require a very specific interface layer that no off-the-shelf product supports.
Generic platforms can force you to change your business rules to match their software, which is exactly the wrong way. A targeted custom application lets your software match your established business processes instead. It is the difference between purchasing a generic outfit from a department store and working with a personal dressmaker; both serve the basic purpose of clothing you, but only one is crafted to your exact proportions.
The Best Custom Tools Fit Around Existing Operations
Custom development shouldn't mean building an entire policy administration system from scratch. Instead, build specific workflow layers that fill the gaps left by commercial software. Specialized builds can deliver strong returns; one cited study reports that custom insurance software can deliver 122.22% ROI and cut compliance violations by up to 60%.
"The most effective insurance software projects aren't the ones that force teams to abandon working processes overnight," says a spokesperson for Brain Box Labs, a development firm that builds custom insurance software for carriers and agencies. "The best results usually come from building targeted tools, interfaces, and workflow layers that fit the insurer's current operations while removing the friction that slows staff and customers down."
The demand for tailored solutions keeps growing. Market analysts project the insurtech sector will grow from USD 23.54 billion in 2026 to USD 132.71 billion by 2034, indicating that insurers are actively investing in software tailored to their specific needs rather than settling for one-size-fits-all platforms.
Set Governance Rules So Modernization Doesn't Turn Into Tool Sprawl
Incremental modernization only works if you actively manage your architecture. Without rules, a phased approach can quickly devolve into software sprawl, and you'll end up with a different problem that's just as expensive.
Avoid Creating a New Mess While Solving the Old One
If every department buys its own software, you risk creating duplicate tools and disconnected automations. Shadow IT creates inconsistent customer data and serious security risks. Clear ownership between IT, operations, and business teams is non-negotiable here.
Establish a committee or a clear leader to oversee all new software purchases. This helps prevent the costly mistake of paying multiple vendors to solve the same problem. It also makes it easier to enforce data standards across the stack, which matters more as your API layer grows.
Use a Simple Decision Framework
Define which systems will remain the source of truth for customer data. Establish who owns workflow design and what security standards all new APIs must follow. These aren't glamorous decisions, but they'll save you from painful cleanup down the road.
Japan's Future Corp recently introduced a fact-based modernization service built around this concept. The approach analyzes operational dependencies and data links before deciding whether to rebuild or pursue a smaller renovation. You should evaluate every new tool against your governance framework before expanding your tech stack.
Measure Progress in Business Terms, Not Just IT Milestones
Judge your modernization efforts by operational outcomes, not just software deployment dates. A successful launch means little if your team still struggles to process a quote in a reasonable timeframe. So what does "success" actually look like?
Track the Metrics Leaders Actually Care About
Align your tech investments with the metrics that drive revenue and retention. Here are the numbers worth watching closely:
- Quote turnaround times (how fast you can get a price in front of a broker or customer)
- Claim cycle times and payment completion rates
- Straight-through processing rate
- Reduction in manual touches per policy
- Broker satisfaction scores
- Cost per transaction
When you connect software upgrades directly to these metrics, proving return on investment becomes much easier. You're not just telling the board you launched a new tool; you're showing them the quote-to-bind time dropped by 40%.
Use Small Wins to Fund Larger Change
Early victories from workflow automation or customer portal upgrades build internal momentum. As noted by executives from Travelers and Liberty Mutual, connecting modernization to specific business outcomes helps secure ongoing executive support.
For example, one major U.S. insurer's cloud overhaul established a secure foundation for AI and delivered 70% faster data insights. Use measurable early wins like that to secure the budget and trust needed for broader organizational change.
Modernization Works Best When It Solves the Right Problem
Start your modernization journey by examining your workflows rather than watching endless vendor demos. You can modernize successfully by leaving your primary legacy system in place and deploying targeted automation, APIs, and customer-facing improvements around it.
Build custom tools only when packaged software fails to support the way your business actually operates. You don't need to wait for a perfect, massive transformation plan. Pick one broken process, one necessary data connection, or one customer-facing pain point today, and begin building a faster, more efficient firm.
More in finance
Venture
Write for entrepreneurs, founders, and builders.
Share startup lessons, growth tactics, and founder stories with readers on the same journey.
One free account across In Plain English, Stackademic, Venture, and Cubed.
How it works- Startups & entrepreneurship
- Marketing & growth
- Productivity & leadership
- Founder stories & lessons learned
Sign in
Google or GitHub
Complete profile
Takes a few minutes
Get approved & publish
Start sharing
Why write for Venture?
Entrepreneurship is rarely a straight path. The lessons worth sharing are learned while building.


Comments
Loading comments…